{"id":2484,"date":"2015-12-01T10:33:11","date_gmt":"2015-12-01T14:33:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cpip.gmu.edu\/?page_id=2484"},"modified":"2026-02-09T21:00:28","modified_gmt":"2026-02-09T21:00:28","slug":"scholarship","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/writing\/scholarship\/","title":{"rendered":"Scholarship"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 style=\"text-align: left\">Navigation<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/writing\/scholarship\/#:~:text=some%20selected%20highlights.-,Recent%20Highlights,-Tabrez%20Y.%20Ebrahim\">Recent Highlights<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/writing\/scholarship\/#:~:text=in%20individualized%20licensing.-,Selected%20Scholarship%20A%20to%20Z,-Ryan%20Abbott%2C\">Selected Scholarship A to Z<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>IPPI is leading a new academic conversation about intellectual property rights and the technological, commercial, and creative innovation they facilitate. Through fellowship programs, research grants, academic conferences, and research symposia, we promote a healthy academic discussion, grounded in rigorous scholarship, that considers the value of patents, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights.<\/p>\n<p>Below are some selected highlights.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Recent Highlights<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Tabrez Y. Ebrahim<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3722720\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Artificial Intelligence Inventions &amp; Patent Disclosure<\/em><\/a>, 125 Penn. St. L. Rev. 147 (2020)\n<ul>\n<li>Description: In his Edison paper at Penn State Law Review, <a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3722720\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Artificial Intelligence Inventions &amp; Patent Disclosure<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, Professor <\/span><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Tabrez Ebrahim<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> of California Western School of Law claims that AI fundamentally challenges disclosure in patent law, which has not kept up with rapid advancements in AI, and seeks to invigorate the goals that patent law\u2019s disclosure function is thought to serve for society. In so doing, Prof. Ebrahim assesses the role that AI plays in the inventive process, how AI can produce AI-generated output (that can be claimed in a patent application), and why it should matter for patent policy and for society. He also introduces a taxonomy comprising AI-based tools and AI-generated output that he maps with social-policy-related considerations, theoretical justifications and normative reasoning concerning disclosure for the use of AI in the inventive process, and proposals for enhancing disclosure and the impact on patent protection and trade secrecy.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Tom\u00e1s G\u00f3mez-Arostegui &amp; Sean Bottomley<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3687893\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Traditional Burdens for Final Injunctions in Patent Cases C.1789 and Some Modern Implications<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 71 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 403 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christa J. Laser<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3686120\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Equitable Defenses in Patent Law<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 75 U. Miami L. Rev. 1 (2020)<\/span>\n<ul>\n<li>Description: In patent law, equitable defenses can play an essential role in multi-million-dollar patent infringement cases. Unclean hands, misuse, or estoppel can render a potential verdict unenforceable. Professor <strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christa Laser<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> of Cleveland-Marshall College of Law dives into the unique and unsettled role of equity in her new Edison paper, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3686120\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Equitable Defenses in Patent Law<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (University of Miami Law Review 2020). Prof. Laser compares two theories to determine how courts might interpret undefined language governing equitable defenses in patent statutes, and she analyzes whether Congress codified preexisting decisional law or expanded it with the 1952 Patent Act. Finally, Prof. Laser suggests that Congress could delegate its authority to an agency to handle the ever-changing patent landscape.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Talha Syed<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3699014\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Owning Knowledge: A Unified Theory of Patent Eligibility<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (American University Law Review, Vol. 70, 2021)<\/span>\n<ul>\n<li>Description: In his draft Edison paper, <a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3699014\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Owning Knowledge: A Unified Theory of Patent Eligibility<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, Professor <\/span><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Talha Syed<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> of Berkeley Law argues that the confusion surrounding patentable subject matter under Section 101 is two-fold. First, it results from our failure to develop a functionality doctrine that can clearly distinguish technological applications of knowledge from other forms of knowledge. Second, he offers a root cause of this failure. There is a distracting preoccupation in patent law with \u201cphysicalism,\u201d that is, the notion that a patent is awarded for a <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">thing<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (tangible or not) rather than for <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">knowledge of<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> that thing. In order to move forward, Prof. Syed states that we must first unwind the physicalist assumptions that are tangled up in our Section 101 analyses. Only then can we develop a functionality doctrine free of those encumbrances.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Deepak Hegde, Joan Farre-Mensa, &amp; Alexander Ljungqvist<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/jofi.12867\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent \u201cLottery\u201d<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 75 J. Finance 639 (2020)<\/span>\n<ul>\n<li>Description: <strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Deepak Hegde<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> of New York University and co-authors <\/span><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Joan Farre-Mensa<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> and <\/span><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Alexander Ljungqvist<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> have published a new paper from our Edison Fellowship program entitled <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/jofi.12867\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent \u201cLottery\u201d<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> in the Journal of Finance. The paper provides empirical evidence that startups that obtain their first patent have, on average, 55% higher employment growth and 80% higher sales growth five years later. Utilizing a unique dataset drawn on unprecedented access to USPTO internal databases, the study also shows with causal evidence that these startups pursue more\u2014and higher quality\u2014follow-on innovation as the first patent boosts innovation by facilitating their access to funding.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Olena Ivus, Edwin L.-C. Lai, &amp; Ted M. Sichelman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/jems.12393\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>An Economic Model of Patent Exhaustion<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 29 J. Econ. &amp; Manag. Strategy 816 (2020)<\/span>\n<ul>\n<li>Description: IPPI Senior Scholar <strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ted Sichelman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> of the University of San Diego, along with <\/span><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Olena Ivus<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> and <\/span><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Edwin Lai<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, published a paper in the Journal of Economics &amp; Management Strategy entitled <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1111\/jems.12393\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>An Economic Model of Patent Exhaustion<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">. The paper, which comes from the Edison Fellowship program, uses a sophisticated economic model to show that, contrary to the Supreme Court\u2019s opinion in <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">Impression Products v. Lexmark<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, mandatory patent exhaustion can be highly inefficient, particularly when transaction costs are low. The authors show that it is socially optimal for patent owners to be able to opt-out of exhaustion via contract when the social benefits from buyer-specific pricing outweigh the social costs from transaction cost frictions in individualized licensing.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Selected Scholarship A to Z<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Ryan Abbott<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uclalawreview.org\/everything-is-obvious\/\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Everything is Obvious<\/em><\/a>, 66 UCLA L. Rev. 2 (2018) [<a href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3056915\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a>]<\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristina M.L. Acri<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/24_4_Lybecker.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Economic Growth and Prosperity Stem from Effective Intellectual Property Rights<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 865 (2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Sandra Aistars<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.law.gmu.edu\/pubs\/papers\/ls18_02\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Ensuring Only Good Claims Come In Small Packages: A Response To Scholarly Concerns About A Proposed Small Copyright Claims Tribunal<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 65 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3129035\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Sandra Aistars, Devlin Hartline, &amp; Mark Schultz<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Aistars-Hartline-Schultz-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Copyright Principles and Priorities to Foster a Creative Digital Marketplace<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 769 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3081057\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan H. Ashtor<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3429083\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Case for Patent Clarity<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Research Policy, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2022) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3429083\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan H. Ashtor<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1370&amp;context=nulr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Does Patented Information Promote the Progress of Technology?<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 113 Nw. U. L. Rev. 943 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2857697\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan H Ashtor<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jels.12237\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Investigating Cohort Similarity as an Ex Ante Alternative to Patent Forward Citations<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 16 J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 848 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3607373\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan H. Ashtor<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.yale.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&amp;httpsredir=1&amp;article=1123&amp;context=yjolt\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Opening Pandora\u2019s Box: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Patent Litigation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 18 Yale J. L. &amp; Tech. 217 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2736556\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan H. Ashtor<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/law.stanford.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/stlr_vol._18_issue_3_final.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Redefining \u201cValuable Patents\u201d: Analysis of the Enforcement Value of U.S. Patents<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 18 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 497 (2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan H. Ashtor, Michael J. Mazzeo, &amp; Samantha Zyontz<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Ashtor-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patents at Issue: The Data Behind the Patent Troll Debate<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 957 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Robert D. Atkinson<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www2.itif.org\/2019-ip-protection-data-economy.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>IP Protection in the Data Economy: Getting the Balance Right on 13 Critical Issues<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Info. Tech. &amp; Innov. Found. Jan. 2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3324641\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">David B. Audretsch<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Audretsch-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Scientific Entrepreneurship: The Stealth Conduit of University Knowledge Spillovers<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1015 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Shyamkrishna Balganesh &amp; Peter S. Menell<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">,\u00a0<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.law.columbia.edu\/faculty_scholarship\/2772\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Restatements of Statutory Law: The Curious Case of the Restatement of Copyright<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 44\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"smallcaps\" style=\"font-size: revert\">Colum. J. L. &amp; Arts\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-size: revert\">285 (2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Shyamkrishna Balganesh<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cdn.vanderbilt.edu\/vu-wp0\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/278\/2020\/01\/21005108\/Privative-Copyright.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Privative Copyright<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 73 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3361422\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Matthew Barblan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Barblan-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Copyright as a Platform for Artistic and Creative Freedom<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 793 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2776797\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan M. Barnett<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/repository.law.umich.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1247&amp;context=mttlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Antitrust Overreach: Undoing Cooperative Standardization in the Digital Economy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 25 Mich. Telecomm. &amp; Tech. L. Rev. 163 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3277667\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan M. Barnett<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24395619\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>From Patent Thickets to Patent Networks: The Legal Infrastructure of the Digital Economy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 55 Jurimetrics J. 1 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2438364\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan M. Barnett<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.competitionpolicyinternational.com\/how-and-why-almost-every-competition-regulator-was-wrong-about-standard-essential-patents\/\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>How and Why Almost Every Competition Regulator Was Wrong About Standard-Essential Patents<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (CPI Antitrust Chron. Dec. 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan M. Barnett<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/global.oup.com\/academic\/product\/innovators-firms-and-markets-9780190908591\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Innovators, Firms, and Markets: The Organizational Logic of Intellectual Property<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Oxford Univ. Press 2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan M. Barnett<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/sites\/cato.org\/files\/2019-12\/v42n4-2.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>\u2018Patent Tigers\u2019 and Global Innovation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 42 Regulation 14 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3574794\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan M. Barnett<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.criterioninnovation.com\/articles\/barnett-patent-tigers.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Tigers: The New Geography of Global Innovation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 2 Criterion J. on Innovation 429 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2842350\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher Beauchamp<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.yalelawjournal.org\/pdf\/n.848.Beauchamp.944_dywbcn97.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The First Patent Litigation Explosion<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 125 Yale L.J. 848 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2488220\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong>Maurizio Borghi<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 2018. <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk\/31036\/\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Copyright, property and personality. Note on Hegel<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">. In: CPIP Colloquium: Philosophical Approaches to IP, 31 May-1 June 2018, Hilton Head, SC, USA. (Unpublished)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Maria Canellopoulou-Bottis<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3298655\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Utilitarianism v. Deontology: A Philosophy for Copyright<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (December 10, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jennifer Brant &amp; McLean Sibanda<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/edocs\/pubdocs\/en\/wipo_casestudy_ip_comm_za.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>South Africa: IP Management and the Commercialization of Publicly Funded Research Outcomes<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (World Intell. Prop. Org. 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Hugh Breakey<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ojls\/gqy020\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Deliberate, Principled, Self-Interested Law Breaking: The Ethics of Digital \u2018Piracy\u2019<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 38 Oxf. J. Leg. Stud. 676 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3219550\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Emily S. Bremer<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/repository.law.wisc.edu\/api\/law_fileserve\/search?mediaID=301855?accessMethod=download\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Exceptionalism Norm in Administrative Adjudication<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 2019 Wis. L. Rev. 1351 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3136793\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Stuart N. Brotman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/jolt.richmond.edu\/files\/2020\/09\/Brotman-FE.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Intersecting Points in Parallel Lines: Toward Better Harmonization of Copyright Law and Communications Law Through Statutory and Institutional Balance<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Rich. J.L. &amp; Tech., no. 3, 1 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Daniel R. Cahoy<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1323&amp;context=njtip\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patently Uncertain<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 17 Nw. J. Tech. &amp; Intell. Prop. 1 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3348570\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Eric R. Claeys<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/bulawreview\/claeys\/\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Claim Communication in Intellectual Property: A Comment on Right on Time<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 100 B.U. L. Rev. Online 4 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Eric R. Claeys<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/ClaeysRelationBetweenIP.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Conceptual Relation Between IP Rights and Infringement Remedies<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 825 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2650134\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Eric R. Claeys<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/20403313.2017.1386460\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Intellectual Property and Practical Reason<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 9 Jurisprudence 251 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2773643\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Julie E. Cohen<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/oxford.universitypressscholarship.com\/view\/10.1093\/oso\/9780190246693.001.0001\/oso-9780190246693-chapter-2\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Everything Old Is New Again\u2014Or Is It?<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">in<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jorge L. Contreras<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/heinonline.org\/HOL\/P?h=hein.journals\/flsulr43&amp;i=1173\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Narratives of Gene Patenting<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 43 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1133 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2485681\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher A. Cotropia &amp; James Gibson<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.richmond.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1972&amp;context=law-faculty-publications\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Copyright\u2019s Topography: An Empirical Study of Copyright Litigation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 92 Tex. L. Rev. 1981 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2400846\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Carys J. Craig<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=3715&amp;context=scholarly_works\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Critical Copyright Law and the Politics of &#8216;IP&#8217;<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">in<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> Research Handbook on Critical Legal Theory (Emilios Christodoulidis, Ruth Dukes, &amp; Marco Goldoni eds., 2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3287377\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Brian Cummings<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Cummings-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Changing Landscape of Intellectual Property Management as a Revenue-Generating Asset for U.S Research Universities<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1027 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">James E. Daily &amp; F. Scott Kieff<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Kieff-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Benefits of Patent Jury Trials for Commercializing Innovation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 865 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Brett Danaher &amp; Michael D. Smith<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/24_4_Danaher_Smith_2.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Digital Piracy, Film Quality, and Social Welfare<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 923 (2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Loletta Darden<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights: Fair or Foul?<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, ___ Colum. J.L. &amp; Arts ___ (forthcoming 2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ross E. Davies<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2020\/09\/Davies-Ebb-and-Flow-in-Safe-Harbors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Ebb and Flow in Safe Harbors: Some Exemplary Experiences Under One Old Statute and One New<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Ctr. for the Prot. of Intell. Prop. Sept. 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Charles Delmotte<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3564793\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Case Against Tax Subsidies in Innovation Policy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, Forthcoming, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 20-40 [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3564793\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ga\u00e9tan de Rassenfosse<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3114637\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Notice Failure Revisited: Evidence on the Use of Virtual Patent Marking<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (January 1, 2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3114637\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ga\u00e9tan de Rassenfosse, Emilio Raiteri, &amp; Rudi Bekkers<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3007699\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Discrimination in the Patent System: Evidence from Standard-Essential Patents<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (January 2, 2023) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3007699\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Gerardo Con Diaz<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\">Computation and Materiality in American Patent Law: The Story of <\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">Halliburton v. Walker, 1935-1946, ___ Enterp. &amp; Soc. ___ (forthcoming 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Gregory Dolin<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=3449&amp;context=bclr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Dubious Patent Reform<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 56 B.C. L. Rev. 881 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2488220\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Gregory Dolin<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1207&amp;context=ckjip\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Yes, The PTAB is Unconstitutional<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 17 Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 457 (2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Abraham Drassinower<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/bulawreview\/files\/2019\/12\/DRASSINOWER.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Death in Copyright: Remarks on Duration<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 99 B.U. L. Rev. 2559 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3521511\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Tabrez Y. Ebrahim<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pennstatelawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Article-4-Tabrez-Ebrahim-AI-Inventions-and-Patent-Disclosure-FORMAT-3.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Artificial Intelligence Inventions &amp; Patent Disclosure<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 125 Penn. St. L. Rev. 147 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3722720\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Tabrez Y. Ebrahim<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3889809\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Intellectual Property from a Non-Western Lens: The Case of Patents in Islamic Law<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (July 19, 2021). Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2021<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Richard A. Epstein<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/EpsteinKeynote.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Keynote Address: Common Ground: How Intellectual Property Unites Creators and Innovators<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 805 (2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristelia A. Garcia<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/btlj.org\/data\/articles2016\/vol31\/31_1\/0183_0258_Garcia_RemedialRegulation_WEB.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Facilitating Competition by Remedial Regulation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 31 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 183 (2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Damien Geradin<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Geradin-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Meaning of \u201cFair and Reasonable\u201d in the Context of Third-Party Determination of FRAND Terms<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 919 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2344454\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Roya Ghafele &amp; Rasmus Kamstrup Bogetoft<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0172219016301053\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Using Patent Valuation Methods to Assess Damages in Patent Infringement Cases Under the Unified Patent Court<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 52 World Pat. Info. 1 (2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Tom\u00e1s G\u00f3mez-Arostegui &amp; Sean Bottomley<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3687893\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Traditional Burdens for Final Injunctions in Patent Cases C.1789 and Some Modern Implications<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 71 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 403 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Gregory Gorder<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Gorder-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Innovation and the Invention Gap: The Need for a New Invention Economy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 811 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Michael S. Greve<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/jostl\/files\/2020\/04\/1.-Greve.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Exceptional, After All and After Oil States: Judicial Review and the Patent System<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 B.U. J. Sci. &amp; Tech. L. 1 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3381076\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kirti Gupta<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/GuptaTechStandards.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Technology Standards and Competition in the Mobile Wireless Industry<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 865 (2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kirti Gupta &amp; Jay P. Kesan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2816701\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Studying the Impact of eBay on Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (July 31, 2016). University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-03<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Stephen Haber<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Haber-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patents and the Wealth of Nations<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 811 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2776773\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Terry Hart<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Hart-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>License to Remix<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 837 (2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Deepak Hegde, Joan Farre-Mensa, &amp; Alexander Ljungqvist<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/jofi.12867\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent \u201cLottery\u201d<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 75 J. Finance 639 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2704028\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Bowman Heiden &amp; Nicolas Petit<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.scu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1627&amp;context=chtlj\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent \u201cTrespass\u201d and the Royalty Gap: Exploring the Nature and Impact of \u201cPatent Holdout\u201d<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 34 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J. 179 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2981577\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.law.missouri.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https:\/\/www.google.com\/&amp;httpsredir=1&amp;article=4148&amp;context=mlr\" rel=\"noopener\">Bowman v. Monsanto<em>: A Bellwether for the Emerging Issue of Patentable Self-Replicating Technologies and Inadvertent Infringement<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 80 Mo. L. Rev. 665 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2731380\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">,\u00a0<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/gmu.us19.list-manage.com\/track\/click?u=73f1076930554cc8de8e87d82&amp;id=c365e9409e&amp;e=39d3bc4ea0\"><em>Branded Drug Companies Are Successfully Asserting the Doctrine of Equivalents in Hatch-Waxman Litigation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 40 Biotech. L. Rep. 72 (Mar. 2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.ou.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&amp;httpsredir=1&amp;article=1299&amp;context=olr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Charting the Contours of a Copyright Regime Optimized for Engineered Genetic Code<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 69 Okla. L. Rev. 399 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2833948\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.liebertpub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/blr.2020.29209.cmh\" rel=\"noopener\">GlaxoSmithKline v. Teva<em>: Holding a Generic Liable for an Artificial Act of Inducement<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 39 Biotech. L. Rep. 425 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">,\u00a0<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.liebertpub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/blr.2020.29211.cmh\"><em>Government Involvement in Pharmaceutical Development Can Come Back to Haunt a Drug Company<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 40 Biotech. L. Rep. 4 (2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Holman-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Mayo Framework Is Bad for Your Health<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 901 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3592905\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.liebertpub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/blr.2020.29191.cmh\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Term Adjustment: Recent Developments at the Federal Circuit and PTO<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 39 Biotech. L. Rep. 266 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Holman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.liebertpub.com\/doi\/10.1089\/blr.2020.29194.cmh\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>State Universities Push the Limits of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity at the Federal Circuit<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 39 Biotech. L. Rep. 347 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ryan T. Holte<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/26-1_5-Holte.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Clarity in Remedies for Patent Cases<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 128 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3492417\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ryan T. Holte<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ideaexchange.uakron.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&amp;httpsredir=1&amp;article=2402&amp;context=akronlawreview\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Submission Policies<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 50 Akron L. Rev. 637 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2867581\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ryan T. Holte<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.law.slu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&amp;context=lj\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Trolls or Great Inventors: Case Studies of Patent Assertion Entities<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 59 St. Louis U. L.J. 1 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2426444\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ryan T. Holte &amp; Christopher B. Seaman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.uw.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=4982&amp;context=wlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Injunctions on Appeal: An Empirical Study of the Federal Circuit&#8217;s Application of eBay<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 92 Wash. L. Rev. 145 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2816097\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ryan T. Holte &amp; Ted M. Sichelman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ilr.law.uiowa.edu\/assets\/Uploads\/ILR-105-1-Holte-Sichelman.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Cycles of Obviousness<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 105 Iowa L. Rev. 107 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3401605\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">John Howells &amp; Ron D. Katznelson<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2801309\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The \u201cOverly-Broad\u201d Selden Patent, Henry Ford and Development in the Early US Automobile Industry<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (forthcoming) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2801309\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Camilla A. Hrdy<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/wlr.law.wisc.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1263\/2015\/05\/2-Hrdy-Final-Online.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Commercialization Awards<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 2015 Wis. L. Rev. 13 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2531056\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Camilla A. Hrdy<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/lawreview.colorado.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Hrdy-The-Reemergence-of-State-Anti-Patent-Law.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Reemergence of State Anti-Patent Law<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 89 U. Colo. L. Rev. 101 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2925588\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Justin Hughes<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Hughes-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Motion Pictures, Markets, and Copylocks<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 941 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2758830\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Olena Ivus &amp; Edwin L.-C. Lai<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3040502\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Exhaustion Regime and International Production Sharing: Winners and Losers?<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (September 11, 2017). CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6644<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Olena Ivus, Edwin L.-C. Lai, &amp; Ted M. Sichelman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.1111\/jems.12393\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>An Economic Model of Patent Exhaustion<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 29 J. Econ. &amp; Manag. Strategy 816 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2921443\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Dmitry Karshtedt<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ilr.law.uiowa.edu\/assets\/Uploads\/ILR-104-3-Karshtedt.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The More Things Change: Improvement Patents, Drug Modifications, and the FDA<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 109 Iowa L. Rev. 1129 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3269908\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jay P. Kesan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Kesan-EconomicRationalesWeb.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Economic Rationales for the Patent System in Current Context<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 897 (2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Zorina Khan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/oxford.universitypressscholarship.com\/view\/10.1093\/oso\/9780190936075.001.0001\/oso-9780190936075\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Inventing Ideas: Patents, Prizes, and the Knowledge Economy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Oxford Univ. Press 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Zorina Khan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w20731.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Inventing in the Shadow of the Patent System: Evidence from 19th-Century Patents and Prizes for Technological Innovations<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (December 2014). NBER Working Paper No. w20731 [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2535183\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Zorina Khan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Khan-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Trolls and Other Patent Inventions: Economic History and the Patent Controversy in the Twenty-First Century<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 825 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2344853\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Edmund W. Kitch<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Kitch-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Crowdfunding and an Innovator\u2019s Access to Capital<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 887 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Bruce H. Kobayashi<em>, <\/em><\/strong><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/KobayashiPandoraBox.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Opening Pandora\u2019s Black Box: A Coasian 1937 View of Performance Rights Organizations in 2014<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 925 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2536986\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christa J. Laser<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3686120\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Equitable Defenses<\/em><em> in Patent Law<\/em>,<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> 75 U. Miami L. Rev. 1 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3686120\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Gary Lawson<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/26-1_2-Lawson.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Appointments and Illegal Adjudication: The American Invents Act Through a Constitutional Lens<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 26 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3105511\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Anne Layne-Farrar<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Layne-Farrar-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Moving Past the SEP RAND Obsession: Some Thoughts on the Economic Implications of Unilateral Commitments and the Complexities of Patent Licensing<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1093 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Stan J. Liebowitz<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/24_4_Liebowitz.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Case for Copyright<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 907 (2017) [SSRN]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Stan J. Liebowitz<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/LiebowitzCritique.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Critique of Copyright Criticisms<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 943 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2533797\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Erika F. Lietzan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/lawreview.richmond.edu\/files\/2019\/05\/Lietzan-534.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Access Before Evidence and the Price of the FDA\u2019s New Drug Authorities<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 53 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1243 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3346574\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Erika Lietzan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.law.missouri.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=4312&amp;context=mlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Drug Innovation Paradox<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 83 Mo. L. Rev. 39 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2948604\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Erika Lietzan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.shu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1677&amp;context=shlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The History and Political Economy of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 49 Seton Hall L. Rev. 53 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3140141\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Erika F. Lietzan<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/26-1_6-Lietzan.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Paper Promises for Drug Innovation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 168 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3103293\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Erika Lietzan &amp; <\/strong><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristina M.L. Acri<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.uw.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=5134&amp;context=wlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Distorted Drug Patents<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 95 Wash. L. Rev. 1317 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3458588\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Daryl Lim<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.scu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1652&amp;context=chtlj\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Judging Equivalents<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 36 Santa Clara Computer &amp; High Tech. L.J. 223 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3438432\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jiarui Liu<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/24_4_Liu_2.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Predatory Effects of Copyright Piracy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 961 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3330213\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Adam J. MacLeod<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.law.ua.edu\/lawreview\/files\/2018\/05\/1-MacLeod-723-780.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Infringement as Trespass<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 69 Ala. L. Rev. 723 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3029708\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Adam J. MacLeod<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/ndlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/7.-MacLeod.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Public Rights After Oil States Energy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 95 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1281 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3327002\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kevin Madigan &amp; Adam Mossoff<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/24_4_Madigan_Mossoff_2.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Turning Gold Into Lead: How Patent Eligibility Doctrine is Undermining U.S. Leadership in Innovation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 939 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2943431\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Keith Mallinson<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mallinson-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Don\u2019t Fix What Isn\u2019t Broken: The Extraordinary Record of Innovation and Success in the Cellular Industry Under Existing Licensing Practices<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 967 (2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Noel Maurer &amp; Stephen Haber<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hoover.org\/research\/empirical-analysis-patent-troll-hypothesis-evidence-publicly-traded-firms\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>An Empirical Analysis of the Patent Troll Hypothesis: Evidence from Publicly-Traded Firms<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (October 29, 2018). Hoover Institution Economics Working Paper 18114<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Charles R. McManis &amp; Brian Yagi<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/McManis-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Bayh-Dole Act and the Anticommons Hypothesis: Round Three<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1049 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Andrew C. Michaels<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalrepository.unm.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2353&amp;context=nmlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Patent Lawyer\u2019s Guide to Fascism on Individual Autonomy and Private Law<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 49 N.M. L. Rev. 169 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3011618\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Adam Mossoff &amp; Eric R. Claeys<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3197275\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Injunctions, Economics, and Rights<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 49 J. Leg. Stud. ___ (forthcoming 2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3197275\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Lateef Mtima<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/tiplj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Volumes\/v28\/Mtima_Final.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Idea Exclusions in Intellectual Property Law<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 28 Tex. Intell. Prop. L. J. 343 (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Lauma Muizniece<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13132-020-00681-x\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>University Autonomy and Commercialization of Publicly Funded Research: The Case of Latvia<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, ___ J. Knowl. Econ. ___ (2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Natasha Nayak<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3388218\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Barrier to Entry and Disruptive Innovation Potential in Big Data Markets: A Literature Review<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (May 14, 2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3388218\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Natasha Nayak<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3129820\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Situating Patent Validity in Antitrust\u2019s Rule of Reason: Exploring the Bounds of Actavis<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (February 25, 2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3129820\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher M. Newman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">,\u00a0<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/gmu.us19.list-manage.com\/track\/click?u=73f1076930554cc8de8e87d82&amp;id=fddee9c3c5&amp;e=39d3bc4ea0\"><em>Isn\u2019t Infringement Ever Apparent?: Toward a Balanced Reading of \u00a7512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 21-03 (Mar. 5, 2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">David Orozco<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ncjolt.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2019\/10\/OrozcoIssue1_Final_.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Assessing the Efficacy of the Bayh-Dole Act Through the Lens of University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs)<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 N.C. J. L. &amp; Tech. 115 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3152148\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">David Orozco<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hofstralawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/CC.3.Orozco.final2_.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Knowledge Police<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 43 Hofstra L. Rev. 417 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristen Osenga<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.richmond.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&amp;httpsredir=1&amp;article=2095&amp;context=law-faculty-publications\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Formerly Manufacturing Entities: Piercing the \u201cPatent Troll\u201d Rhetoric<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 47 Conn. L. Rev. 435 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2476556\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristen Osenga<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.richmond.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2512&amp;context=law-faculty-publications\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Ignorance Over Innovation: Why Misunderstanding Standard Setting Operations Will Hinder Technological Progress<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 56 U. Louisville L. Rev. 159 (2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristen Osenga<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.aulawreview.org\/au_law_review\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/03-Osenga.to_.Printer.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Institutional Design for Innovation: A Radical Proposal for Addressing \u00a7 101 Patent-Eligible Subject Matter<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 68 Am. U. L. Rev. 1191 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3283933\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Kristen Osenga<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/OsengaSticks.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Sticks and Stones: How the FTC\u2019s Name-Calling Misses the Complexity of Licensing-Based Business Models<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1001 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2834140\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Sean A. Pager<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/PagerUpstarts.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Making Copyright Work for Creative Upstarts<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 22 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1021 (2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Walter G. Park<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/24_4_Park_2.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Averting a \u201cTripsxit\u201d From the Global Intellectual Property System<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 24 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 883 (2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">James Pooley<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Pooley-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Myth of the Trade Secret Troll: Why the Defend Trade Secrets Act Improves the Protection of Commercial Information<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1045 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2692382\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Eric Priest<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/ir.lawnet.fordham.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1610&amp;context=iplj\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Copyright and Free Expression in China\u2019s Film Industry<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media &amp; Ent. L.J. 1 (2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Eric Priest<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Priest-FINAL.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Meet the New Media, Same as the Old Media: Real Lessons from China\u2019s Digital Copyright Industries<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1079 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2901073\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Eric A. Priest<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><em style=\"font-size: revert\"><a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4043130\" rel=\"noopener\">An Entrepreneurship Theory of Copyright<\/a><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (February 24, 2022). Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 36, 2022<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jonathan D. Putnam &amp; Tim A. Williams<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2835617\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Smallest Salable Patent-Practicing Unit (SSPPU): Theory and Evidence<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (September 6, 2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2835617\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Yi Qian &amp; Margaret Kyle<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2543650\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Intellectual Property Rights and Access to Innovation: Evidence from TRIPS<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (December 2014). NBER Working Paper No. w20799 [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2543650\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Michael Risch<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digital.sandiego.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&amp;context=sdlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Generation of Patent Litigation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 52 San Diego L. Rev. 67 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2484947\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Michael Risch<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Risch-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Licensing Acquired Patents<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 979 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2366064\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Michael Risch<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/bulawreview\/files\/2018\/01\/RISCH.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>(Un)Reasonable Royalties<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 98 B.U. L. Rev. 187 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2884387\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Keith Robinson<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/via.library.depaul.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=4110&amp;context=law-review\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Using Interactive Inventions<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 69 DePaul L. Rev. 95 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3530393\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Gregory Salmieri<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/26-1_7-Salmieri.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Intellectual Property and the Freedom Needed to Solve the Crisis of Resistant Infections<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 215 (2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Mark Schultz, Kevin Madigan, Debra Waggoner, &amp; Roy Kamphausen<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/26-1_4-Schultz.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Using IP Best Practices Dialogues to Improve IP Systems Globally: The Example of the Trade Secrets Law Best Practices Dialogue<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 88 (2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Nicola Searle<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3599891\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Business Models and Copyright Reform: The Legal Business Model<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (May 13, 2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3599891\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jacob S. Sherkow<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.law.uw.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=4865&amp;context=wlr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Administrating Patent Litigation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 90 Wash. L. Rev. 205 (2015) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2486987\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Jacob S. Sherkow<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarship.law.unc.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=5720&amp;context=nclr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Cancer\u2019s IP<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 96 N.C. L. Rev. 297 (2018) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2928241\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Ted M. Sichelman &amp; Ryan T. Holte<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3719135\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Codebooks for Cycles of Obviousness<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 105 Iowa L. Rev. 107 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3719135\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Brenda M. Simon<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=2241&amp;context=blr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patents, Information, and Innovation<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 85 Brook. L. Rev. 727 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3393302\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Talha Syed<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3699014\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Owning Knowledge: A Unified Theory of Patent Eligibility<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (September 23, 2020). American University Law Review, Vol. 70, 2021 [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3699014\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">David O. Taylor<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/cardozolawreview.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/6.-Taylor.41.5.3.FINAL-1.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Eligibility and Investment<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 41 Cardozo L. Rev. 2019 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3340937\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">David J. Teece &amp; Edward F. Sherry<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/businessinnovation.berkeley.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/businessinnovation-archive\/documents\/Tusher-Center-Working-Paper-10.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Licensing and Standards Setting: The Multiple Meanings of \u201cEx Ante\u201d Negotiations and Implications for Public Policy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (May 21, 2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Shine Tu<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/heinonline.org\/HOL\/P?h=hein.journals\/stantlr17&amp;i=506\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Patent Examiners and Litigation Outcomes<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 17 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 507 (2014) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2458140\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">V.K. Unni<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007%2Fs40319-019-00783-3\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>India\u2019s TRIPS Compliant Patent Decade \u2013 The Tumultuous Journey in Search of a Pragmatic Equilibrium<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 50 Int\u2019l Rev. Intell. Prop. &amp; Competition L. 161 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3335620\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Saurabh Vishnubhakat<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=4669&amp;context=wlulr\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Disguised Patent Policymaking<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 76 Wash. &amp; Lee L. Rev. 1667 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3242146\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Saurabh Vishnubhakat<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hofstralawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/BB.6.Vishnubhakat.NEW_.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Field of Invention<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 45 Hofstra L. Rev. 899 (2017) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2857155\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Christopher J. Walker &amp; Melissa F. Wasserman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.californialawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/3-Wasserman-and-Walker.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The New World of Agency Adjudication<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 107 Cal. L. Rev. 141 (2019) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3129560\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Runhua Wang<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=4092&amp;context=clevstlrev\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Decoding Judicial Reasoning in China: A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Guiding Cases<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 68 Clev. St. L. Rev. 521 (2020) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3442644\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Joshua D. Wright<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.georgemasonlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Wright-Website-Version.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>SSOs, FRAND, and Antitrust: Lessons from the Economics of Incomplete Contracts<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 791 (2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Stephen Yelderman<\/strong><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/heinonline.org\/HOL\/P?h=hein.journals\/bulr96&amp;i=1599\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Coordination-Focused Patent Policy<\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, 96 B.U. L. Rev. 1565 (2016) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2481025\" rel=\"noopener\">SSRN<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Navigation Recent Highlights Selected Scholarship A to Z IPPI is leading a new academic conversation about intellectual property rights and the technological, commercial, and creative innovation they facilitate. Through fellowship programs, research grants, academic conferences, and research symposia, we promote a healthy academic discussion, grounded in rigorous scholarship, that considers the value of patents, copyrights, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3627,"featured_media":0,"parent":616,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2484","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3627"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2484"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2484\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16162,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2484\/revisions\/16162"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}