{"id":857,"date":"2013-11-18T20:00:39","date_gmt":"2013-11-18T20:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cpip.gmu.edu\/?page_id=857"},"modified":"2026-04-01T18:42:28","modified_gmt":"2026-04-01T18:42:28","slug":"amicus-briefs","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/writing\/amicus-briefs\/","title":{"rendered":"Amicus Briefs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>IPPI scholars play an active role in the legal debate about intellectual property rights and the technological, commercial, and creative innovation they facilitate. IPPI scholars have written, organized, and\/or joined amicus briefs in a wide variety of cases.<\/p>\n<p>Below are some selected highlights (in descending chronological order).<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<ul>\n<li>In\u00a0<em><strong>Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al., v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. et al.<\/strong><\/em>, Supreme Court of the United States \u2013 &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1670\/2026\/03\/amicus-Hikman-v-Amarin_24-889-bsac-Michel.pdf\">Brief of Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul R. Michel and Scholars of Law and Economics as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Respondents<\/a>&#8221; (March 2026)\n<ul>\n<li>Signed by IPPI Affiliates <strong>Dr. Kristina M. L. Acri, n\u00e9e Lybecker<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Michael Doane<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Dr. Bowman Heiden<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Joshua Kresh<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>The Honorable Paul Michel<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Emily Michiko Morris<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Kristen Jakobsen Osenga<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Douglas Park<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>Mark F. Schultz<\/strong>, and\u00a0<strong>Ted M. Sichelman<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>In <em><strong>Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. et al<\/strong>,<\/em> Supreme Court of the United States \u2013 &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/25\/25-308\/386311\/20251203174331849_251203%20Amicus%20Brief%20Lynk%20Labs%20v%20Samsung%20Electronics.pdf\"><em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Brief of Intellectual Property and Innovation Scholars in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8221; (U.S. December 3, 2025) \u2013 By IPPI Senior Scholar\u00a0<strong>Ted Sichelman<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Also signed by IPPI Associate Faculty Chair, Senior Fellow for Life Sciences, &amp; Senior Scholar <strong>Emily Michiko Morris<\/strong>, IPPI Research Professor and Executive Director\u00a0<strong>Joshua Kresh<\/strong>, &amp; IPPI Faculty Chair &amp; Senior Scholar\u00a0<strong>Mark Schultz<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>In <em><strong>Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH; West Publishing Corp v. ROSS Intelligence Inc<\/strong>,<\/em> United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit \u2013 &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.ca3.125346\/gov.uscourts.ca3.125346.106.0.pdf\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Professors Sandra Aistars, Robert Brauneis, Megan Carpenter, Kevin Casini, Jon M. Garon, Timothy T. Hsieh, Joshua Kresh, Jake Linford, Philippa Loengard, Loren E. Mulraine, Sean A. Pager, Eric Priest, Zvi Rosen, Mark F. Schultz and Bhamati Viswanathan in Support of Thomson Reuters and West Publishing<\/a>&#8221; (U.S. November 26, 2025)<\/li>\n<li>In <strong style=\"font-size: revert\"><em>Cox Communications, Inc., et al <\/em><em>v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.<\/em><\/strong><em style=\"font-size: revert\">,<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> Supreme Court of the United States \u2013 &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/24\/24-171\/380293\/20251022121734618_Cox%20v%20Sony%20Music%20Ent%2024-171%20Boyden%20Amicus%20filing.pdf\">Brief of Amicus Curiae Prof. Bruce E. Boyden in Support of Respondents<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. October 22, 2025)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In <em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\">Cox Communications, Inc., et alv. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.<\/strong><\/em><em style=\"font-size: revert\">,<\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> Supreme Court of the United States &#8211; &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/24\/24-171\/380357\/20251022180128532_24-171%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf\">Brief Amicus Curiae of Intellectual Property Law Scholars in Support of Respondents<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\">\u00a0(U.S. October 22, 2025)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In <strong style=\"font-size: revert\"><em>Arbutus Biopharma Corp. and Genevant Sciences GmbH v. Moderna, Inc. and ModernaTX, Inc.<\/em><\/strong>,<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> United States Court for the District of Delaware &#8211; &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/media.hudson.org\/Amicus+Brief+of+16+Former+Judges+Officials+Academics+-+Arbutus+v+Moderna+SJ+8.22.2025.pdf\">Brief of 16 Former Judges, Former Officials, and Academic Scholars as Amicus Curiae in Opposition in Part to Defendants&#8217; Motion for Summary Judgment<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. August 22, 2025)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Richard Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, United States District Court for the Northern District of California San Francisco Division &#8211; &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.cand.415175\/gov.uscourts.cand.415175.525.0.pdf\">Amicus Brief of Copyright Law Professors<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. April 2025)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> TCL v. Access Advance<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, Shenzhen Intermediate People\u2019s Court, Intellectual Property Division &#8211; &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/chinaipr.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/en-tclvaa-amicus-.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of Randall R. Rader, David J. Kappos and Mark A. Cohen<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. October 2024) [<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/chinaipr.com\/2024\/11\/04\/acess-advance-and-tcl-a-submission-to-the-shenzhen-court\/\" rel=\"noopener\">more information at China IPR<\/a><span style=\"font-size: revert\">]<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Jeffrey B. Sedlik v. Katherine Von Drachenberg, Kat Von D, Inc., High Voltage Tattoo, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2024\/10\/24-1022-Amicus-Brief-of-Tattoo-Artists.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of Tattoo Artists Ross C. Berg, Jonny Gomez, and Maxime Plesciabuchi in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and in Support of Reversal<\/a>&#8221; <span style=\"font-size: revert\">(U.S. October 2024)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers LLC, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., and Penguin Random House LLC v. Internet Archive<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2024\/03\/Filed-Brief_Hachette-v.-Internet-Archive_Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-Professor-and-Scholars-of-Copyright-and-Intellectual-Property-Law-in-Support-of-Plaintiffs-Appellees-and-Affirmance_3.22.24.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae <\/em>Professor and Scholars of Copyright and Intellectual Property Law in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmance<\/a>&#8221; <span style=\"font-size: revert\">(U.S. March 2024)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Loper Brights Enterprises, et al., v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/laweconcenter.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Manhattan-Inst-Epstein-Hurwitz-Manne-Zywicki-Amicus-Brief-in-Loper-Bright-SCOTUS-2023.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of the Manhattan Institute and Professors Richard Epstein, Todd Zywicki, Gus Hurwitz, and Geoffrey Manne as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Supporting Petitioners<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. July 2023)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> CareDx, inc. et al. v. Natera, et al.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/22\/22-1066\/267766\/20230525162220890_22-1066%20Amici%20Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of the Honorable Paul R. Michael (Ret.) and Professor John F. Duffy as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioners<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. May 2023)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Arbutus Biopharma Corp., et al. v. Moderna, Inc., et al.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2023\/03\/March-2023-Amici-Curiae-1498.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Letter Brief from <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Law Professors, Scholars, and Former Government Officials<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. March 2, 2023)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In <em><strong>Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. HEC Pharm Co., Ltd., HEC Pharm USA Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/22\/22-671\/255165\/20230221122914790_22-671acIntellectualPropertyProfessors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Intellectual Property Professors in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. February 21, 2023)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In <em><strong>The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc., v. Lynn Goldsmith and Lynn Goldsmith, Ltd.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/21\/21-869\/233549\/20220815162730208_21-869bsacProfZviSRosen.pdfA.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> Prof. Zvi S. Rosen in Support of Respondents<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. August 15, 2022)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In <em><strong>The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc., v. Lynn Goldsmith and Lynn Goldsmith, Ltd.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/21\/21-869\/233495\/20220815140948843_220807a%20Amicus%20Brief%20for%20efiling.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice and Intellectual-Property Professors in Support of Respondent<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. August 15, 2022)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers LLC, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., and Penguin Random House LLC v. Internet Archive<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2022\/08\/Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-Professors-and-Scholars-of-Copyright-Law-in-Support-of-Plaintiffs-and-in-Opposition-to-Internet-Archive_August-2022.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Professors and Scholars of Copyright Law in Support of Plaintiffs and in Opposition to Internet Archive<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. August 5, 2022)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Accord Healthcare Inc., etc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/fedcircuitblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Amicus-Brief2-21-1070.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Brief of\u00a0<em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Intellectual Property Law Professors in Support of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation&#8217;s Petition for Panel and\u00a0<em>En Banc<\/em> Rehearing<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. August 4, 2022)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Limited<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/fedcircuitblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Sas-v.-World-Prog-21-1542-Amici-Copyright-Alliance.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\">Corrected Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Scholar of Copyright Law in Upport of Plaintiff-Appellants and Reversal<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. May 28, 2021)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Celgene v. Peter<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/19\/19-1074\/139571\/20200331163329034_Amicus%20Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Intellectual Property Law Professors in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Mar. 31, 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Google v. Oracle<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2020\/02\/Google-v-Oracle-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-9-Professors-and-Scholars-of-IP.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Nine Professors and Scholars of Intellectual Property Law in Support of Respondent<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Feb. 19, 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/19\/19-46\/133449\/20200219132452540_19-46bsacTrademarkAndInternetLawProfessors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Trademark and Internet Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Respondent<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\">\u00a0(U.S. Feb. 19, 2020)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2019\/08\/Skidmore-v-Led-Zeppelin-Amicus-Brief-of-Sean-OConnor-and-IIPSJ.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> of Professor Sean O\u2019Connor and Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice (IIPSJ) in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (9th Cir. July 1, 2019)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Athena Diagnostics Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2019\/05\/Athena-v-Mayo-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-Seven-Law-Professors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Seven Law Professors in Support of the Petition for Rehearing <em>En Banc<\/em><\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Return Mail Inc. v. United States Postal Service and United States<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2018\/12\/Return-Mail-v-USPS-Brief-of-Seven-Law-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Seven Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\">\u00a0(U.S. Dec. 17, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Brammer v. Violent Hues Productions LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2018\/11\/Brammer-v-Violent-Hues-Arts-Entertainment-Advocacy-Clinic-Amicus-Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> Arts &amp; Entertainment Advocacy Clinic at George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (4th Cir. Oct. 29, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> American Axle &amp; Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLC, Neapco Drivelines LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2018\/07\/American-Axle-v-Neapco-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-12-Patent-Law-Scholars.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> 12 Patent Law Scholars in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. July 6, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Return Mail Inc. v. United States Postal Service and United States<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2018\/06\/Return-Mail-v-United-States-Postal-Service-Brief-of-15-Law-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 15 Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. June 25, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Creative Compounds, LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2018\/04\/Natural-Alternatives-v-Creative-Compounds-Brief-of-Amicus-Curiae-Patent-Law-Scholars.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> Patent Law Scholars in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and Reversal<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland HeartLab, Inc. v. True Health Diagnostics, LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2018\/03\/Cleveland-Clinic-v-True-Health-Brief-of-Law-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\">\u00a0(Fed. Cir. Feb. 28, 2018)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> RecogniCorp LLC v. Nintendo Co. Ltd.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/12\/RecogniCorp-v.-Nintendo-Brief-of-IP-Law-Profs-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Intellectual Property Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Dec. 4, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene\u2019s Energy Group LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"https:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/08\/Oil-States-Amicus-Brief-by-27-Law-Professors-Final.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 27 Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Aug. 31, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/03\/Amgen-v-Sandoz-Brief-for-Amici-Curiae-11-Professsors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief for <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> 11 Professors in Support of Amgen Inc., et al., as Cross-Petitioners<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Mar. 17, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/03\/TC-Heartland-v-Kraft-Foods-Brief-of-22-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 22 Law, Economics and Business Professors in Support of Respondent<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Mar. 8, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Cascades Projection LLC v. Epson America, Inc. and Sony Corporation<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/03\/Cascades-v-Epson-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-13-Law-Professors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> 13 Law Professors in Support of the Petition for Hearing <em>En Banc<\/em><\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/02\/Impression-v-Lexmark-Brief-of-Adam-Mossoff-and-Gregory-Dolin-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Respondent<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Feb. 23, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/02\/Impression-v-Lexmark-Brief-of-44-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 44 Law, Economics and Business Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Respondent<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Feb. 23, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/03\/Wi-Fi-One-v-Broadcom-Brief-of-Amici-Curiae-Professors-of-Patent-and-Administrative-Law.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Professors of Patent and Administrative Law in Support of Neither Party<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Feb. 23, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/02\/Oracle-v-Google-IP-Scholars-Amicus-Brief-FILED.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> of Intellectual Property Scholars in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> TDE Petroleum Data Solutions, Inc. v. AKM Enterprise, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/02\/TDE-v-AKM-Brief-of-15-Law-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 15 Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Feb. 16, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Converse, Inc. v. International Trade Commission<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/cip2.gmu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2017\/02\/Converse-v-ITC-Brief-of-11-Law-Professors-as-Amici-Curiae.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 11 Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2017)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/07\/Amicus-Brief-Ten-Law-Professors-Trading-Tech-v-CQG.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Ten Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. July 18, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/06\/Fox-News-v-TVEyes-IP-Scholars-Amicus-Brief-2d-Cir.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> of Intellectual Property Scholars in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (2d Cir. June 22, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/05\/MCM-Portfolio-v-Hewlett-Packard-Amicus-Brief-of-13-Law-Professors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 13 Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. May 27, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/04\/Sequenom-v-Ariosa-Amicus-Brief-of-19-Law-Professors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of 19 Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Apr. 20, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien LP<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, <\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/03\/Ethicon-v-Covidien-Amicus-Brief-of-Eleven-Law-Professors.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> Eleven Law Professors in Support of the Petition for Rehearing <em>En Banc<\/em><\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/03\/Cuozzo-v.-Lee-Amicus-Brief-of-Professors-Dolin-Manta-Mossoff-Osenga-and-Schultz.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Law Professors Gregory Dolin, Irina D. Manta, Adam Mossoff, Kristen Jakobsen Osenga, and Mark F. Schultz as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Feb. 29, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Eli Lilly and Co. v. Government of Canada<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2013\/11\/Eli-Lilly-v-Canada-IP-Law-Professors-Amicus-Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Non-Disputing Party <em>Amicus Curiae<\/em> Submission of Intellectual Property Law Professors<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (NAFTA Ch. 11 Trib. Feb. 12, 2016)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott PLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2016\/01\/Mylan-Pharmaceuticals-v.-Warner-Chilcott-Dolin-Mossoff-and-Osenga-Amicus-Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Law Professors Gregory Dolin, MD, JD, Adam Mossoff, JD, and Kristen Osenga, JD, as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Appellees&#8217; Opposition to Appeal<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (3d Cir. Dec. 21, 2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2015\/08\/Ariosa-v-Sequenom-Amicus-Brief-FINAL-FILED.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Twenty-Three Law Professors in Support of Appellant&#8217;s Petition for Rehearing <em>En Banc<\/em><\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2015\/07\/Fox-News-v.-TVEyes-Amicus-Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of the Copyright Alliance and Various Professors of Law and Copyright Experts as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Plaintiff\u2019s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (S.D.N.Y. July 15, 2015)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2013\/11\/Authors-Guild-v.-Google.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Jon Baumgarten, Stuart Brotman, Raymond Nimmer, Mark Schultz, and John Simson as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants The Authors Guild, Et Al.<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (2d Cir. Apr. 14, 2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> State of New York v. Actavis PLC<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2012\/08\/New-York-v.-Actavis-Amicus-Brief.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Professors Dolin, Holte, Lande, Mossoff and Osenga as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Defendants-Appellants and Urging Reversal<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (2d Cir. Jan. 15, 2014)<\/span><\/li>\n<li>In<em><strong style=\"font-size: revert\"> Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg Inc.<\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: revert\">, &#8220;<\/span><a style=\"font-size: revert\" href=\"http:\/\/sls.gmu.edu\/cpip\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/31\/2013\/11\/Soverain-Software-v.-Newegg.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Brief of Law Professors as <em>Amici Curiae<\/em> in Support of Petitioner<\/a>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: revert\"> (U.S. Nov. 18, 2013)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IPPI scholars play an active role in the legal debate about intellectual property rights and the technological, commercial, and creative innovation they facilitate. IPPI scholars have written, organized, and\/or joined amicus briefs in a wide variety of cases. Below are some selected highlights (in descending chronological order). In\u00a0Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al., v. Amarin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3627,"featured_media":0,"parent":616,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-857","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3627"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=857"}],"version-history":[{"count":41,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/857\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16495,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/857\/revisions\/16495"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uakron.edu\/ualawip\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}