Categories
CPIP Roundup

CPIP Roundup – October 31, 2019


Greetings from CPIP Executive Director Sean O’Connor

Sean O'Connor

CPIP started a busy and productive October with our Seventh Annual Fall Conference, The IP Bridge: Connecting the Lab & Studio to the Market, which featured—among many informative and well-received panels and presentations—keynote addresses by Professor Robert Merges of UC Berkeley and Maria Pallante of AAP. The video of Professor Merges’ keynote is available here, and the rest of the videos will be posted on the conference website soon. Thank you to all who attended and took part!

In mid-October, CPIP held the second meeting of our copyright research symposium, Safe Harbors and Private Ordering in the Creative Industries, at Antonin Scalia Law School. Several scholars presented drafts of their papers and received feedback from the rest of the participants. In other October news, former CPIP Research Assistant and recent Scalia Law graduate Cassandra Sciortino has been named a Barbara A. Ringer Fellow at the U.S. Copyright Office. We congratulate her on the appointment and wish her success in her new role and beyond.

This has also been a great month for CPIP engagement in events and scholarship, and we are proud of all those whose work is featured below. My own October included a presentation at the Fifth Annual IP Mosaic Conference at Howard Law School in conjunction with the Institute for Intellectual Property & Social Justice (IIPSJ), as well as a co-presentation with CPIP Deputy Director Kevin Madigan for members of the Japan Intellectual Property Organization (JIPA), during which we spoke on Scalia Law’s history, IP, and CPIP’s work. I also participated as a lecturer, moderator, and panelist at the Law and Economics Center’s recent symposium in Denver, Colorado.

We’re looking forward to a November of planning and engagement that will give CPIP a strong start in 2020. In the meantime, best wishes for the rest of your fall and the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday!


Join Us for a Panel Presentation on the CASE Act on November 14

CASE act panel flyer

On Thursday, November 14, CPIP and the Intellectual Property Law Society (IPLS) will co-host a panel presentation entitled The CASE Act: Why Creators Need a Small Claims Tribunal at Scalia Law. The panel includes CPIP Director of Copyright Research and Policy Sandra Aistars, Terrica Carrington of the Copyright Alliance, and Tom Kennedy of American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP), and it will be moderated by CPIP Director of Communications Devlin Hartline.

The Copyright Alternative Small-Claims Enforcement Act (CASE Act) would create a tribunal within the U.S. Copyright Office to hear small copyright claims. This panel features three leading experts who have each played an important role in advocating for the CASE Act. They will discuss the substance and history of the CASE Act, its prospect for being passed by the Senate, and what it means for individuals and small businesses who have welcomed the meaningful copyright protection that the bill would provide.


Spotlight on Scholarship

a pair of glasses, an apple, and a stack of books

Daryl Lim, Judging Equivalents (forthcoming)

In this forthcoming paper from our Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship, Daryl Lim of John Marshall Law School looks at the doctrine of equivalents, which gives patentees protection beyond the literal words of their claims. Professor Lim surveys the law and literature over the past 150 years and provides empirical data that helps to clarify the doctrine’s nature and contextualize its evolution and future.

Jonathan Ashtor, Modeling Patent Clarity (forthcoming)

In this forthcoming paper supported by a CPIP Leonardo da Vinci Fellowship Research Grant, Jonathan Ashtor of Cardozo Law employs sophisticated machine learning techniques to model patent clarity and provide unprecedented empirical analyses of the relationships between patent clarity and the public and private value of patent rights. The results empirically demonstrate the importance of patent clarity to the social and private functions of patents.

Runhua Wang, New Private Law? Intellectual Property ‘Common-Law Precedents’ in China (forthcoming)

In this forthcoming paper from our Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship, Runhua Wang of Chicago-Kent College of Law surveys twenty-two guiding cases that act as binding precedent in IP cases in China and compares them with corresponding judicial precedents in the United States. Dr. Wang argues that these guiding cases are not conventional private or public law, and she explains how they take a utilitarian and pragmatic approach to statutory interpretation.


Activities, News, & Events

a lit lightbulb hanging next to unlit bulbs

CPIP Senior Scholar Kristen Osenga has been appointed the Austin E. Owen Research Scholar at the University of Richmond School of Law. Professor Osenga joined the faculty in Richmond in 2006, where her recent scholarship focuses on patent eligible subject matter, patent licensing firms, standard setting organizations, patent law reform, and claim construction, and she has written numerous law review articles on these and other topics. The CPIP team sends Professor Osenga its warmest congratulations on a well-deserved appointment!

The recent drug patent research paper written by CPIP Director of Life Sciences Erika Lietzan and Professor Kristina Acri of Colorado College has been positively received this past month. The paper, Distorted Drug Patents, will be published in the Washington Law Review, and it has been featured by Politico, Bloomberg Law, Patently-O, and FDA Law Blog as a valuable contribution to the empirical research on whether the patent system provides adequate incentives for innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.

CPIP Director of Copyright Research and Policy Sandra Aistars and CPIP Director of Communications Devlin Hartline lectured to a group of visiting IP professionals from the Zhejiang Provincial Administration for Market Regulation in China at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government. Professor Aistars discussed private ordering in copyright enforcement, while Professor Hartline talked about protecting brands in a modern economy.

Categories
CPIP Roundup

CPIP Roundup – August 29, 2019


Greetings from CPIP Executive Director Sean O’Connor

Sean O'Connor

With a new academic year beginning at Antonin Scalia Law School, the CPIP team continues to build on a productive summer of scholarship, events, and more. Our WIPO-CPIP Summer School on Intellectual Property this past June boasted 70 students from 30 countries for a two-week crash course on the law and policy of IP in order to help advance their careers. And our Fifth Summer Institute in Beaver Creek, Colorado, this past July brought together IP scholars, policy analysts, and professionals in the innovation and creative industries to discuss the current state of affairs and to work on translating ideas into policy.

Looking ahead, we’re getting ready for our upcoming Seventh Annual Fall Conference, which will take place at Scalia Law on October 4. We’ll also be co-hosting the 31st Annual Intellectual Property Section Seminar with the IP Section of the Virginia State Bar on September 20-21 at Scalia Law. We’re thrilled as well that CPIP Director of Copyright Research and Policy Sandra Aistars will continue her work with the law school’s Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Clinic, while I will be focusing more on the patent side as I lead the law school’s new Innovation Law Practicum.

I hope you’ve had a wonderful summer, and I look forward to seeing you at our future events!


Registration Open for CPIP’s Seventh Annual Fall Conference on October 4

CPIP 2019 Fall Conference flyer

On October 4, 2019, CPIP will host its Seventh Annual Fall Conference at Antonin Scalia Law School in Arlington, Virginia. The theme of this year’s conference is The IP Bridge: Connecting the Lab & Studio, and it features keynote addresses by Professor Robert Merges, UC Berkeley, and Maria Pallante, President & CEO of AAP and former Register of Copyrights. 5 hours Virginia CLE, including 1.5 hours Ethics, available!

This unique conference will highlight how IP rights facilitate the creative and innovative processes and preserve the vibrant ecosystems that deliver innovative products and creative works to consumers. In addition to exploring how IP helps to improve and enrich the lives of creators, inventors, and the public, this conference will also discuss how various efforts to impose price controls in the creative and innovation industries threaten established markets and the creation of innovative products and artistic works.

Please click here to register. We look forward to seeing you in October!


Spotlight on Scholarship

a pair of glasses, an apple, and a stack of books

Kristen Osenga, Institutional Design for Innovation: A Radical Proposal for Addressing § 101 Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, 68 Am. U. L. Rev. 1191 (2019)

In this paper supported by a CPIP Leonardo da Vinci Fellowship Research Grant, CPIP Senior Scholar Kristen Osenga investigates the jumbled state of patent-eligible subject matter in the United States. Following an analysis of those entities currently wielding the power to make decisions on patent eligibility—and an assessment suggesting that other reforms will not solve the issue at its roots—Professor Osenga instead proposes and defends the revolutionary plan of turning over patent-eligibility decisionmaking authority to the courts.

Mark F. Schultz, The Market for Performance Rights in Sound Recordings: Bargaining in the Shadow of Compulsory Licensing (forthcoming)

In this forthcoming paper, CPIP Senior Scholar Mark Schultz discusses government regulations on licensing rights and rates for sound recordings, focusing on how their artificial nature divorces creators’ control and compensation from the marketplace. After exploring the negative impact of this arrangement on creators, consumers, and the market at large, Professor Schultz suggests policy changes for overhauling (and not merely recalibrating) the current, outdated system.

Jonathan M. Barnett, Antitrust Overreach: Undoing Cooperative Standardization in the Digital Economy, 25 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 163 (2019)

In this paper from our Sixth Annual Fall Conference, CPIP Senior Scholar Jonathan Barnett analyzes the benefits of standardization in ICT markets and the importance of IP rights and enforced contracts in keeping standardization relationships reciprocal rather than imposed by exterior monopolization. Professor Barnett looks at threats to cooperative standardization as posed by regulators and legislation—in particular, how implementation is favored over, and to the detriment of, innovation.


Activities, News, & Events

a lit lightbulb hanging next to unlit bulbs

CPIP Executive Director Sean O’Connor leads the law school’s new Innovation Law Practicum this fall. The Practicum will provide teams of students the opportunity to counsel entrepreneurs, creators, and inventors from the university’s internal and external communities. The course will teach students about entrepreneurship and commercializing innovation and creativity, as well as how to craft an overall legal strategy in the context of a client’s business, technology, and/or artistic vision. Anticipated projects include providing an initial assessment of legal issues and business planning, followed by specific legal services such as entity formation, securing IP, or drafting employment agreements upon mutual agreement with the client.

CPIP Director of Copyright Research and Policy Sandra Aistars heads the law school’s Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Clinic again this fall. The Clinic will continue its partnership with the U.S. Copyright Office by helping it and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) organize a conference on AI and copyright. The Clinic will also help mentor Native American musicians and promote cultural understanding via their music, work with a Grammy-nominated musician on a multi-disciplinary project, work with an author to register numerous books, advocate for the CASE Act, explore the intersection of copyright and constitutional law by representing parties interested in solving problems related to state sovereign immunity in cases of willful copyright infringement, and conduct an entertainment law education session and pop-up clinic with the Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts (WALA) during the DC Shorts Film Festival.

CPIP Executive Director Sean O’Connor joined Professors Lateef Mtima and Steve Jamar of the Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice (IIPSJ) in filing an amicus brief in Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin, a case currently before the en banc Ninth Circuit. The amicus brief argues that the courts should not improperly restrict composers to the “lead sheet” deposit copy for determining the scope of copyright protection for a musical composition. The brief explains how this position denies social justice to those whose backgrounds or musical styles preclude the use of traditional musical notation, and it argues that phonorecords or other contemporaneous documentation should be allowed as evidence of the scope of the copyrighted work.

Categories
CPIP Roundup

CPIP Roundup – May 23, 2019


Sean O’Connor Joins George Mason University’s Scalia Law Faculty

Sean O'Connor

O’Connor will lead the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property and expand innovation and entrepreneurship programs.

Professor Sean O’Connor, noted innovation law scholar, is joining George Mason University’s Scalia Law faculty as a tenured full professor and Executive Director of the Center for Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP). He will continue the renowned CPIP programming while also expanding it into innovation and entrepreneurship law more broadly. O’Connor will lead development of new clinics and the law school’s participation in university-wide multidisciplinary initiatives such as the proposed Institute for Digital InnovAtion (IDIA).

“The time is right for George Mason and Northern Virginia to mature into the world class tech and innovation hub that is already emergent,” says O’Connor. Henry N. Butler, Dean of Scalia Law, embraces the move, “given CPIP’s impact on IP to date, our location, and the arrival of Amazon’s HQ2, the law school is perfectly situated to expand CPIP’s sphere of influence into innovation and entrepreneurship law.”

To read the rest of this announcement, please click here.


Spotlight on Scholarship

a shelf full of books

Here is some excellent, recently-published scholarship from the growing network of scholars participating in our various programs and events:

Ryan Abbott, Everything is Obvious, 66 UCLA L. Rev. 2 (2018)

Jonathan H. Ashtor, Does Patented Information Promote the Progress of Technology?, 113 Nw. U. L. Rev. 943 (2019)

Robert D. Atkinson, IP Protection in the Data Economy: Getting the Balance Right on 13 Critical Issues (forthcoming)

Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Censorial Copyright, 73 Vand. L. Rev. ___ (2020)

Jonathan M. Barnett, Antitrust Overreach: Undoing Cooperative Standardization in the Digital Economy (forthcoming)

Michael Greve, Exceptional, After All and After Oil States: Judicial Review and the Patent System (forthcoming)

Natasha Nayak, Barrier to Entry and Disruptive Innovation Potential in Big Data Markets: A Literature Review (forthcoming)

Sean O’Connor, The Multiple Levels of ‘Property’ in IP and Why That Matters for the Natural Versus Regulatory IP Debates, 27 Geo. Mason L. Rev. ___ (2019)

David Orozco, Assessing the Efficacy of the Bayh-Dole Act Through the Lens of University Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), 21 N.C. J.L. & Tech. ___ (2019)

To read these papers and others, please click here.


George Mason Law Review Publishes Papers from CPIP’s Fifth Annual Fall Conference

a pair of glasses, an apple, and a stack of books

The papers from our Fifth Annual Fall Conference have been published by the George Mason Law Review. The papers can be found online at the Law Review’s website, or you can download them below:

Gary Lawson, Appointments and Illegal Adjudication: The America Invents Act Through a Constitutional Lens, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 26 (2018)

Sandra M. Aistars, Ensuring Only Good Claims in Small Packages: A Response to Scholarly Concerns About a Proposed Small Copyright Claims Tribunal, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 65 (2018)

Mark Schultz, Debra Waggoner, Roy Kamphausen, & Kevin Madigan, Using IP Best Practices Dialogues to Improve IP Systems Globally: The Example of the Trade Secrets Law Best Practices Dialogue, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 88 (2018)

Ryan T. Holte, Clarity in Remedies for Patent Cases, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 128 (2018)

Erika Lietzan, Paper Promises for Drug Innovation, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 168 (2018)

Gregory Salmieri, Intellectual Property and the Freedom Needed to Solve the Crisis of Resistant Infections, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 215 (2018)

To read the conference papers, please click here.


Smithsonian Panel Presentation on Software as Intellectual Property

a lit lightbulb hanging next to unlit bulbs

On Wednesday, June 12, 2019, from 1:00 – 2:30 PM, CPIP and the Smithsonian’s Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation will co-host a panel discussion at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in Washington, D.C., entitled Software as Intellectual Property. This event is free and open to the public, and there is no registration.

Panelists will discuss the history and development of software IP protections while considering the concerns of inventors, corporations, and consumers.

Speakers include:

Robert W. Bahr, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGerardo Con Diaz, Assistant Professor, Science and Technology Studies, University of California, Davis

Susann Keohane, Global Leader for Healthy Aging & Longevity, IBM Research

Moderator: Arthur Daemmrich, Director, Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation

Closing Remarks: Sean O’Connor, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University

To visit our event website, please click here.


Recent CPIP Programs & Events

a hand under a lightbulb drawn on a blackboard

IP & Philosophy Research Colloquium. On May 2-3, 2019, CPIP held its fourth annual Philosophical Approaches to Intellectual Property colloquium at Antonin Scalia Law School in Arlington, Virginia. The colloquium brought together scholars conducting research at the intersection of IP and philosophy, featuring works-in-progress presentations as well as roundtable discussions.

Second 2019-2020 Edison Fellowship Meeting. On April 18-19, 2019, CPIP hosted the second meeting of the 2019-2020 Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship in Scottsdale, Arizona. At the meeting, the Edison Fellows presented their research proposals and received valuable feedback from Senior Commentators and other Fellows.

Copyright Roundtable. On March 28-29, 2019, CPIP hosted an academic roundtable, Copyrightability and Developments in Technology and the Law, in New Orleans, Louisiana. This roundtable explored current “hot topics” in copyrightability, technology, and the law, investigating what has transpired in the courts as well as how these precedents might impact the rights of authors and interests of audiences as AI takes hold in various sectors.

To see more of our programs and events, please click here.


CPIP Scholars File Amicus Brief on Fixing Section 101

Washington, D.C. at night

On April 22, 2019, CPIP scholars filed an amicus brief on behalf of seven patent law professors in Athena Diagnostics Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services LLC, a case currently before the Federal Circuit. The brief argues that the Federal Circuit should take the case en banc to correct the continued misapplication of the Mayo-Alice test, which has resulted in many breakthrough inventions and discoveries in the biopharmaceutical sector being struck down as patent-ineligible subject matter.

The brief concludes: “The majority’s analysis of patent eligibility doctrine contradicts Supreme Court decisions in famous and oft-cited cases in which the Court affirmed the patentability of cutting-edge inventions and discoveries. This Court has the decisional authority within the Supreme Court’s Mayo-Alice framework to reestablish reliable and effective patent rights in new and useful diagnostic methods made possible by the biotech revolution. Thus, this Court should grant the petition for rehearing en banc and reverse the panel decision.”

To read the amicus brief, please click here.


Recent CPIP Scholar Essays & Op-Eds

the word "inspiration" typed on a typewriter

Sandra Aistars & Kevin Madigan, CASE Act Promises Long-Overdue Access to Justice for Individuals and Small Businesses in the Arts, IPWatchdog, May 9, 2019

Devlin Hartline, Twenty Years Later, DMCA More Broken Than Ever, CPIP Blog, April 24, 2019

Chris Katopis, Empirical Study Confirms Positive Relationship Among Patents, Technological Progress, and Societal Benefit, CPIP Blog, April 16, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Case To Watch: Eagle v. Azar’s Hidden Chevron-Step-1 Issue, Objective Intent, May 14, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Moving the (Over-Regulated) Music Industry into Modern Times, Federalist Society, April 24, 2019

Kristen Osenga, When the Patent System Works, Washington Times, April 25, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Over-Regulation is Killing Medical Innovation – But It’s Not the Agency You Think, Federalist Society, April 30, 2019

Ted Sichelman, Sichelman: A Defense And Explanation Of The U.S. News ‘Citation’ Ranking, TaxProf Blog, March 20, 2019

To read more essays and op-eds, please click here.


Recent CPIP Scholar News Mentions

U.S. Capitol building at night

Sandra Aistars, Friday’s Endnotes – 05/10/19, Copyhype, May 10, 2019

Jonathan Barnett, Why It’s Rarely Easy to Prove Joke Theft in the Legal World, Variety, March 19, 2019

Devlin Hartline, Fordham 27 (Report 3): DMCA – 20 Years Later, IPKat, April 25, 2019

Devlin Hartline, ASCAP Daily Brief for April 30, 2019, ASCAP, April 30, 2019

Chris Holman, Athena Diagnostics Amici Warn of Harms to Biotech Revolution under Current Alice/Mayo Framework, IPWatchdog, April 25, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Selling CBD in Food is Illegal, FDA Says. So Why Are So Many Retailers Selling It?, The Ledger, March 26, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Social Media Reacts to Study Claiming Skipping Breakfast Leads to Heart Death, DocWire, April 24, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Professor Lietzan Speaks About Top Cases in Food and Drug Law, University of Missouri School of Law News, May 9, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Professor Lietzan Presents Paper at Law and Biosciences Workshop, University of Missouri School of Law News, May 13, 2019

Kevin Madigan, Friday’s Endnotes – 05/10/19, Copyhype, May 10, 2019

Sean O’Connor, Sean O’Connor Joins George Mason University’s Scalia Law Faculty, Scalia Law News, May 14, 2019

Sean O’Connor, Transitions: New President at Iona College, U. of California at Los Angeles Selects Provost, The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 16, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Apple Pays for Its Patent Infringement, But Important Legal Cases Continue, IPWatchdog, March 19, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Athena Diagnostics Amici Warn of Harms to Biotech Revolution under Current Alice/Mayo Framework, IPWatchdog, April 25, 2019

Ted Sichelman, Athena Diagnostics Amici Warn of Harms to Biotech Revolution under Current Alice/Mayo Framework, IPWatchdog, April 25, 2019

To see more scholars in the news, please click here.


Recent CPIP Scholar Speaking Engagements

the Washington Monument

Jonathan Barnett, Panelist, LeadershIP 2019, The IP Policy Landscape: US and the World, March 26, 2019

Devlin Hartline, Speaker, U.S. Copyright Office Roundtable, Section 512 Study, April 8, 2019

Devlin Hartline, Speaker, 2019 Fordham IP Conference, Twenty Years Later, DMCA More Broken Than Ever, April 25, 2019

Chris Holman, Speaker, McGeorge Changing Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Conference, Drug Cost and Access, April 6, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Speaker, Mason Law & Economics Center Symposium, The Hatch-Waxman Act and Generic Drugs, April 14, 2019

Erika Lietzan, Speaker, Stanford Law and the Biosciences Workshop, Access Before Evidence and the Price of FDA’s New Drug Authorities, May 6, 2019

Sean O’Connor, Speaker, McGeorge Changing Regulation of Pharmaceuticals Conference, Drug Cost and Access, April 6, 2019

Sean O’Connor, Speaker, 2019 Fordham IP Conference, Can the Music Modernization Act’s Database Actually Solve the Music Licensing Problem?, April 26, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Speaker, 2nd Annual Intellectual Property Scholarship Redux Conference, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, April 12, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Speaker, Federalist Society Video, Iancu v. Brunetti [SCOTUSbrief], April 12, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Panelist, Federalist Society Teleforum, The Songwriting Industry and Antitrust Consent Decrees, April 25, 2019

Kristen Osenga, Speaker, University of Richmond Synopsis, The Synopsis: Apple v. Pepper, 2019, May 17, 2019

To see more scholar speaking engagements, please click here.

Categories
CPIP Roundup

CPIP Roundup – March 19, 2019


Spotlight on Scholarship

shelf full of books

There has been some excellent, recently-published scholarship from the growing network of scholars participating in our various programs and events. Here are five law review articles that you should check out!

Adam MacLeod, Public Rights After Oil States Energy, 95 Notre Dame L. Rev. ___ (2019). In this paper from our Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship, Professor Adam MacLeod of Faulkner Law discusses the important role of public rights in the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, particularly in the recent Oil States v. Greene’s Energy case.

Erika F. Lietzan, Access Before Evidence and the Price of FDA’s New Drug Authorities, 53 U. Rich. L. Rev. ___ (2019). In this paper from our Sixth Annual Fall Conference, Professor Erika Lietzan of Mizzou Law looks at the costs and benefits when new drugs are made available before their efficacy and safety has been established.

Daniel R. Cahoy, Patently Uncertain (forthcoming). In this paper from our Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship, Professor Dan Cahoy of Penn State draws upon behavioral economics to develop a new framework for assessing the effects of uncertainty for innovators in the patent system.

V.K. Unni, India’s TRIPS-Compliant Patent Decade – The Tumultuous Journey in Search of a Pragmatic Equilibrium, 50 Int’l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Competition L. 161 (2019). In this paper from our Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship, Professor V.K. Unni of IIM Calcutta surveys patent disputes in India during the first decade of its compliance with TRIPS.

David O. Taylor, Patent Eligibility and Investment (forthcoming). In this paper from our Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship, Professor David Taylor of SMU Law presents empirical data about the impact of the Supreme Court’s patent-eligibility jurisprudence on investment decisionmaking.

To read these papers and many more on our Scholarship page, please click here.


Registration Now Open for WIPO-CPIP Summer School on Intellectual Property

WIPO Summer School flyer

CPIP has again partnered with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to host the second iteration of the WIPO-CPIP Summer School on Intellectual Property on June 3-14, 2019, at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, in Arlington Virginia. U.S. law students can receive 3 hours of academic credit from Scalia Law!

This exclusive, two-week summer course will be held just minutes from Washington, D.C., one of the world’s key centers of IP law and policymaking. The course provides a unique opportunity for students, professionals, and government officials to work with leading experts to gain a deeper knowledge of IP to advance their careers.

For more information, please click here.


Recent CPIP Programs & Events

U.S. Capitol building at night

On March 3, 2019, the Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Clinic joined the Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts (WALA) to co-host an Intellectual Property Drop-In Clinic at the D.C. Independent Film Festival in Washington, D.C. The Clinic students provided legal information and conducted intake interviews to help artists determine if they might need and qualify for a referral to an attorney offering pro bono or low-fee legal services.

On February 28-March 2, 2019, CPIP hosted the first meeting of the 2019-2020 Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship in San Diego, California. The meeting, which focused on research methodologies and developing research ideas, featured several days of academic roundtable discussions, as well as presentations by inventors and other representatives from the innovation industries.

On February 7-8, 2019, CPIP hosted a research symposium, Safe Harbors and Private Ordering in the Creative Industries, at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, in Arlington, Virginia. The symposium brought together scholars, lawyers, and industry professionals to discuss the legal and policy issues surrounding Section 512(i) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

On January 17-18, 2019, CPIP held the final meeting of the 2018-2019 Thomas Edison Innovation Fellowship in Orlando, Florida. At the meeting, the Edison Fellows presented final drafts of their research papers and received valuable feedback from Senior Commentators and other Fellows.


CPIP Scholars Join Issue Paper Arguing for End to Outdated ASCAP and BMI Consent Decrees

sheet music

On February 21, 2019, CPIP Senior Scholars Adam Mossoff and Kristen Osenga joined SIU Law’s Mark Schultz and Texas A&M Law’s Saurabh Vishnubhakat in drafting an issue paper entitled De-Regulating the Songwriting Business. The issue paper, which was published by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project, argues that the consent decrees that have governed songwriters since the 1940s should be ended in order to take full advantage of modern technologies for the distribution of music.

The issue paper concludes: “The ASCAP and BMI consent decrees are long outdated relics, imposing heavy and often unpredictable regulation on songwriters and music publishers. DOJ’s 2016 attempt to double down on regulating the industry instead of easing regulation shows just how problematic running an industry by consent decree can be. This over-reaching interpretation would have limited the flexibility of songwriters to determine their own creative and economic destinies.”

To read the issue paper, please click here.


CPIP Scholars File Comments with ITC to Correct Misapplication of Public Interest Factor for Injunctive Relief

Washington, D.C. at night

On February 7, 2019, CPIP Senior Scholars Kristen Osenga and Adam Mossoff filed comments with the International Trade Commission (ITC) entitled The Use and Abuse of the “Public Interest” in the International Trade Commission and in Article III Courts. The comments were filed as part of the ITC’s investigation into the dispute between Qualcomm and Apple over the importation of infringing smartphones.

In the ITC proceedings, the administrative law judge held that, even though the smartphones contained infringing technology, the public interest precluded the issuance of an exclusion order. The comments note how the recent trend in which injunctive relief is denied upon a finding of infringement harms the innovation economy that depends on stable and effective patent rights. Moreover, the comments survey the historical role of the public interest factor, noting that it was used improperly in this case given the way it has traditionally been used.

To read the comments, please click here.


CPIP Scholars Draft Federalist Society Issue Paper on How the FTC Harms Healthcare Innovation

scientist looking through a microscope

On January 28, 2019, the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project published an issue paper entitled How Antitrust Overreach is Threatening Healthcare Innovation. CPIP Senior Scholars Adam Mossoff and Kristen Osenga joined former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader, SIU Law’s Mark Schultz, and Texas A&M Law’s Saurabh Vishnubhakat in drafting the issue paper.

The issue paper, which addresses how the FTC’s antitrust overreach in the healthcare market hinders innovation and harms consumers, concludes: “The FTC’s goals may be well-intentioned, but its intrusion into domains that other, more expert agencies already oversee and comprehensively regulate is troubling. By substituting its own agenda for the business judgment of sophisticated parties in the marketplace, the FTC has overreached its proper role and begun to disrupt the cycle of investment, product development, recoupment, further incremental advancement, and risk management that drives the creation of new drugs that save lives and promote greater public health.”

To read the issue paper, please click here.


Essays & Op-Eds

hand under a lightbulb drawn on a chalkboard

Kristen Osenga, What Happened to the Public’s Interest in Patent Law?

Erika Lietzan, Changes in the New Orange Book — Or, Too Much Time on My Hands

Vanessa Pierce Rollins, Unverified Theory Continues to Inform FTC’s Policies Toward Patent Owners

Kevin Madigan, Supreme Court Holding on Recoverable Costs Misses the Mark

Devlin Hartline, How the Supreme Court Made it Harder for Copyright Owners to Protect Their Rights—And Why Congress Should Fix It

Chris Katopis & Devlin Hartline, Supreme Court to Assess USPTO’s Controversial Attorneys’ Fees Position

Devlin Hartline, CPIP Scholars Join Comments to FTC on How Antitrust Overreach is Threatening Healthcare Innovation

Erika Lietzan, Patent Term Restoration – Denied!

Devlin Hartline, CPIP’s Sean O’Connor Files Comments with FTC on Consumer and Competition Concerns with Copyright Licensing

Kevin Madigan, Netflix’s Alliance with the MPAA Signals a Shift

Devlin Hartline, CPIP Scholars Join Comment Letter to FTC Supporting Evidence-Based Approach to IP Policymaking

Chris Katopis, U.S. Rise in International IP Index Signals Progress in Ongoing Effort to Restore Faith in the Patent System


CPIP Scholar Mentions & Speaking Engagements

a pair of glasses, an apple, and a stack of books

Jonathan Barnett, Dispatches from the Patent Wars: The High-Stakes Battle Between Qualcomm and Apple, Federalist Society Teleforum

Jonathan Barnett, What it All Boils Down to in FTC vs. Qualcomm, San Diego Union-Tribune

Jonathan Barnett, SEPs Need Injunctions Too, Law360

Jonathan Barnett, Fox Employees on High Alert as Disney Acquisition Looms, CBR

Jonathan Barnett, Anxiety, AWOL Executives and “Bloodshed”: How Disney Is Making 21st Century Fox Disappear, Hollywood Reporter

Devlin Hartline, The ASCAP Daily Brief for March 11, 2019, ASCAP

Chris Katopis, IP Policy and Congress, GW Law IP Writing Seminar

Erika Lietzan, Professor Lietzan Quoted by CBS News on Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Recall, University of Missouri School of Law News

Erika Lietzan, Drugmaker Behind Ibuprofen Recall Has History of FDA Violations, CBS News

Adam Mossoff, The FTC Goes After Qualcomm, Forbes

Adam Mossoff, An Overreaching Patent Office Appeal Board Threatens Innovation and Inventors, Politico

Adam Mossoff, The FTC Joins Huawei on a Misguided Troll Hunt, Wall Street Journal

Adam Mossoff, SEPs Need Injunctions Too, Law360

Adam Mossoff, Supreme Court to Hear Clothing Brand’s ‘Scandalous’ Trademark Case, Washington Times

Adam Mossoff, Did eBay v. MercExchange Go Too Far?, USC Gould Reforming Patent Reform Conference

Adam Mossoff, Cicero Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents, Written Description

Kristen Osenga, The Realpolitik of Intellectual Property, 2019 AALS Annual Meeting

Kristen Osenga, Dispatches from the Patent Wars: The High-Stakes Battle Between Qualcomm and Apple, Federalist Society Teleforum

Kristen Osenga, Industry Insiders: Opinions Mixed in Aftermath of Supreme Court Holding in Helsinn, IPWatchdog

Eric Priest, Music in the Digital Age, 3rd Annual Oregon Sports and Entertainment Conference

Ted Sichelman, Did eBay v. MercExchange Go Too Far?, USC Gould Reforming Patent Reform Conference