Spring 2012 Schedule Distributed via Email

The Spring 2012 schedule has been distributed to the ua-law listserv.  Please make sure you check your email and do not delete this message.  At this time the University is still experiencing server problems preventing us from being able to post this information to the web.  Also, due to the University unforseen circumstances not only is the Law School schedule unavailable through Zipline, but the entire University Spring 2012 schedule has also not yet been released.  As we receive information on the release of this information, we will keep you posted.  Until then, please use the Spring 2012 schedule attached to the email to begin your Spring semester planning.  Also mark your calendars with the below registration dates, keeping in mind that registration opens at 6:00 P.m. on the dates listed.  Attention First Year Full and Part-time Students: The Dean’s Office will register you for all Spring 2012 classes.

Friday, October 14, 2011 at 6:00 p.m.
D3 (Law School credits completed totaling 59 credits or above)
E4 (Law School credits completed totaling 67 credits or above)

Monday, October 17, 2011 at 6:00 p.m.
D2 (Law School credits completed totaling 30 to 58 credits)
E3 (Law School credits completed totaling 45 to 66 credits)

Wednesday, October 19, 2011 at 6:00 p.m.
D1 (Law School credits completed totaling 0 to 29 credits)
E2 (Law School credits completed totaling 23 to 44 credits)

Friday, October 21, 2011 at 6:00 p.m.
E1 (Law School credits completed totaling 0 to 22 credits)

 

 

 

Robert P. Merges to visit School of Law on October 11, 2011

“Justifying Intellectual Property” is the title of a new book by Prof. Robert P. Merges, of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.  Prof. Merges will discuss his new book during a luncheon address at the law school on Tuesday, Oct. 11 at 12:30 in Room 152.  All students and faculty are invited to attend. 

In his book, Prof. Merges responds to those who argue that intellectual property rights are inefficient, unfair and theoretically incoherent.  Drawing on the works of Locke, Kent, and other philosophers, Prof. Merges crafts an original theory to explain why IP rights make sense as a reward for effort and as a way to encourage individuals to strive.  

Prof. Merges holds the Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Professor of Law chair at Berkeley and is the co-founder of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.

Spring 2012 Schedules to be released next week.

Registration begins Friday, October 14, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. for D3/E4 students and will continue on the priority registration schedule into the week of October 17th.  Due to current curriculum changes being implemented in connection with our new JD/LLM program effective the Spring 2012 semester we have been unable to get the Spring 2012 schedule to you sooner.  We have been informed that those changes are almost complete and plan to have the Spring 2012 schedule to the student body  by Tuesday of next week.  We will post an announcement with the link to the schedule once it is available.  Thank you.

Fall 2011 Exam Schedules Email

The Fall 2011 Exam Schedule with Room assignments has been emailed to your zips.uakron.edu email account, along with the Exam Accommodation Need Memo.   Please check your emails and do not delete this message since it is currently the only format that you will be able to receive and view this information.  Currently the University of Akron website is down and we are unable to post the schedule to the web.  Once the web editor is back up and working properly you will be able to view this information at www.uakron.edu/law/about/calendar.dot.

Dean’s Blog – September, 2011

I’m sure many of you have been reading the series of articles talking about the lack of jobs for law school graduates and also the games that some law schools are playing in exaggerating their employment numbers.   This topic, as you can imagine, has also been a source of numerous conversations by law school deans across the country. 

So, let me try to put this issue in some perspective.  Of the 134 members of the class that graduated in 2010, 91.8 percent reported that they were employed 9 months after graduation.  Of those 123, thirty percent went into solo or small firm practice.  Twenty three percent went to work in government (including judicial clerkships).   One- fourth worked in business and industry.  A few are working in academic settings ( 5%).  A few more are employed in public interest work (6%) and some got jobs in larger firms (6.5%).

So the bottom line is that our students got jobs. They did not necessarily get the jobs they wanted  but they are working and, with a few exceptions, using their legal skills and training.  The average salary for those who reported their salaries is $55,980.  Only about 40% in fact report their salary, so this number may be higher or lower but it does give us a base for comparison with other schools.  And because of our affordable tuition,  our class of 2010 students had a relatively low law school loan debt of $60,149, substantially below the national public law school loan debt for that class of $69,687 and way, way below the national private law school loan debt of $106,249.

These numbers are decent, but we want to do even better.  We have developed great bar prep programs to maintain our status as a school with a top bar passage rate. We believe our community service mandate will allow more networking for future jobs.  I also make a pitch every time I talk to alums and other lawyers that they should be hiring our students.  Our new per hour student research program is also providing needed experience and again networking.  And as we implement our increasingly skills based curriculum, we believe our students will be even more competitive in the law and law-related marketplace.

We do not play games in reporting our statistics on employment.  For example, we do not hire students at specific times to build up our employment numbers.  We push as hard as we can for  full disclosure by our students of their job status. 

But now comes my shocking statement. I do not believe we have too many lawyers. The American people are under-lawyered.  I’m not talking about those lawyers who specialize in boutique practices or serve business or work in government.  I’m talking about servicing the rest of us.  If one is poor or even middle class, one only goes to a lawyer when they have a problem.  They seldom seek a lawyer’s assistance to avoid or prevent a problem.  We must find better ways to make routine legal services both affordable and available.  Have a lawyer check your credit card agreement!  Have a lawyer read your closing documents for your house and then attend the closing!  Have a lawyer prepare your will!  Have a lawyer write that letter to the store owner or government official who is non-responsive or worse!

When I was younger [yes, I was once young], people went to a doctor when they were sick.  They didn’t go for a checkup or diet assistance or even for scrapes, minor injuries or a cold.  But now most people have medical plans and they do.  The concern now is that we do not have enough doctors.

In a recent article in the Economist [September 3, 2011], the editors talked about a recent books that argued that the number of lawyers has been kept artificially low for decades.  Barriers should be lifted; prices for services should go down; alternatives to traditional fee paying must be explored.

I agree. And I believe that present students will fill the gap and provide for the delivery of legal services to the majority and not, as now, the tiny majority.